Weirdness is the “new new thing”

comments 21
book review
Jim Clark and Marc Andreessen

“The important events in capitalism no longer occur mainly in oak-paneled offices, if indeed they ever did. They can happen in the least likely of places. On a boat in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, for instance.”

Michael Lewis

The title of this piece is procured from Michael Lewis’ underrated book, the New New Thing, detailing the life of a classic Silicon Valley character, Jim Clark.

Jim Clark was a professor at Stanford, the creator of Silicon Graphics and the Geometry chip, and an engineering prodigy.

In the life after, he created the Geometry engine that ignited the computer graphics industry and then co-founded Netscape with Marc Andreesen. Nothing short of a Silicon Valley legend.

But, why is his story interesting?

“Maybe the simplest is the way Clark described it to himself: the guy who finds the new new thing and makes it happen wins. The engineers who help him to do it finish second. The financiers and the corporate statesmen, the sucker fish of economic growth, finish a distant third. Clark intended to sit on top of Silicon Valley as surely as Microsoft sat on top of the personal computer. Of course, he was not the first engineer with a taste for money and power. He was just the one who finally said, “Now’s the time to take it.”

This year, the economics nobel prize was given to Paul Romer, who works on New Growth theory. This theory is in a nutshell the equivalent of what Jim Clark was building 30 years ago. In less mathematical notation than Romer, New Growth theory posits that ideas are capital in the gears of the economy – they can have massive sway over various sectors and thus eventually be shown in GDP calculations.

People complain about lower productivity growth, manufacturing output, and a stagnant middle class in America: little to none of these people go on to address the problem.

Clark is like Churchill, who had famously remarked:

“I like things to happen, and if they don’t happen I like to make them happen.”

But unlike Churchill’s long-forgotten era, Clark believed that the real power was given to the builders of society: the engineers.

As he built one of the foundational companies of the 80s, Silicon Graphics International, Clark was later kicked out to bring in what Lewis’ calls an Organizational man: someone with no personality and who is quintessially boring. Good at steering the ship, but little else.

On the other hand, Clark would buy yachts, configure them to his liking, and set sail around the world wherever he wanted to go (he had no knowledge of ships before his first 7-figure purchase).

Not someone who belongs in an oak-paneled office, no matter how nice it is perceived to be. Dick Kramlich, a venture capitalist, said:

“Jim’s a revolutionary, you know. He’s out to revolutionize whatever needs to be revolted against.” [..]

“[Dick’s colleagues] thought Jim Clark was a bit of a crazy guy”

Entirely it was “revolting” against the Organizational man and everything the status quo stood for. But how do we get more Jim Clarks?

What I find funny is that people invest in start-ups expecting outsized returns, but also want those returns to arise from normal people. Normal people don’t make companies.

Chris Dixon puts it simply:

You’ve either started a company or you haven’t.  ”Started” doesn’t mean joining as an early employee, or investing or advising or helping out.  It means starting with no money, no help, no one who believes in you (except perhaps your closest friends and family), and building an organization from a borrowed cubicle with credit card debt and nowhere to sleep except the office. It almost invariably means being dismissed by arrogant investors who show up a half hour late, totally unprepared and then instead of saying “no” give you non-committal rejections like “we invest at later stage companies.”

It means looking prospective employees in the eyes and convincing them to leave safe jobs, quit everything and throw their lot in with you.  It means having pundits in the press and blogs who’ve never built anything criticize you and armchair quarterback your every mistake. It means lying awake at night worrying about running out of cash and having a constant knot in your stomach during the day fearing you’ll disappoint the few people who believed in you and validate your smug doubters.

I don’t care if you succeed or fail, if you are Bill Gates or an unknown entrepreneur who gave everything to make it work but didn’t manage to pull through. The important distinction is whether you risked everything, put your life on the line, made commitments to investors, employees, customers and friends, and tried – against all the forces in the world that try to keep new ideas down – to make something new.”

Certainly, people throw around arguments that they would be a “Jim Clark” if they were born into privilege like Bill Gates, or if they had skipped a grade like Steve Jobs.

Both of these are red herrings. People like Jim Clark don’t fit the fold: this is precisely why venture capital general partners can be paid unbelievable sums of money.

Live in the future, then build what’s missing.

Paul Graham

Let’s say you wanted to be a Jim Clark. To do so, the most optimal way would be to fully explore your weird interests. When we’re young, those interests can be beaten out of us; it’s Girardian Terror. I’d bet they still lie within us somewhere: when we’re walking down the street, sitting in class or at work, or engaging in conversation. Those passions don’t escape us so easily.

What is weird now is essentially what the nerds are working at on the weekends. Why is this the case? Dixon proclaims that at other times, society expects something from us in the form of time and labour. Weekends, nevertheless, are sacred geek time. Time to think and tinker. These ideas are the things we believe that others would disagree with us on. Today, I think, for most of the world, the weird ideas lie in building open networks such as blockchain-related technologies, programming medicine, and space infrastructure.

I’m most partial to space tech as I’ve always been the most fascinated by astronomy and aerospace innovation. However people have little to no idea that there is already a space race occurring between the vast powers of the world: China is exploring every crevice of the market to continue expansion.

The other reason many lack knowledge about these advancements is that they perceive these projects as mere “toys.” They used to call those people hobbyists, then it turned out those hobbyists made all the money. There is hysteresis in technology and working on cool projects: we’re too quick to dismiss innovation until it happens all at once like the smartphone era.

Being weird, vouching for AC while everyone else is pro-DC, is the only way to be Jim Clark-esque. It’s a hedge against being power and it’s the only way to build the future. In my life, I’ve been hesitant to write off people for acting unnaturally and arguing for implausible ideas. Over time, those people have become my closest friends. Maybe we can all learn to appreciate the bizarre a bit more – it’s definitely the “new new thing.”


  1. Anonymous says

    Really interesting article. The debate around individuals being more risk-adverse and not daring to explore “toys” is easy framable through the understanding of their real means (The famous question of “What are you in it for?”), as well as how much they are ready to go through the pains of innovations in their space. Given these two, I would even try to imagine the possibility of legitimising their choices of playing it safe.
    For the sake of the discussion, it would also be good to frame the matrices & spectrums delineating the potential for a “new new thing” to become something far greater than expected. It is tempting to invest time into what is perceived to be the latest-cutting edge tech advancement recently made, but what is even more tempting is being able to see it through, observing the light at the end of the tunnel without hoping there’s one.
    Ideas like business teams may not be the always the best one to come up with a result, but if they’re framed well enough to be able to execute/be executed, then that’s all you need.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Anirudh Pai says

      Playing it safe often becomes more like playing the lottery than anything else. As Thiel summarized: diversification in portfolios is simply an excuse for laziness – for not doing the grunt work of maneuvering through complexity. Play at its most pure, from science to investing, is heterodox to those who don’t understand it. Others may be able to execute better but they never had the breakthrough idea.


  2. Pingback: To Be Underrated – Anirudh Pai

  3. I like the helpful info you provide to your articles.
    I will bookmark your blog and test once more here regularly.
    I am moderately sure I’ll be informed many new stuff right here!
    Good luck for the next!


  4. Definitely believe that which you said. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the web the easiest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people
    could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.


  5. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic
    to be actually something which I think I would never understand.
    It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your
    next post, I will try to get the hang of it!


  6. Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this site.
    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s challenging to get that “perfect balance” between usability and appearance.
    I must say you have done a very good job with this.
    Also, the blog loads very fast for me on Internet
    explorer. Superb Blog!


  7. I am not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic.
    I needs to spend some time learning much more or
    understanding more. Thanks for wonderful info I was looking for this info for my mission.


  8. Attractive portion of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to
    claim that I get actually enjoyed account your weblog posts.
    Anyway I’ll be subscribing on your augment or even I success you access persistently quickly.


  9. I am not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic.

    I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.

    Thanks for magnificent info I was looking for this info for my mission.


  10. Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so
    much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you can do with some pics to drive the message
    home a little bit, but instead of that, this is magnificent blog.

    An excellent read. I will definitely be back.


  11. Excellent post. I used to be checking constantly
    this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely helpful information particularly the final part 🙂 I
    handle such information a lot. I was looking for this certain information for a long time.

    Thank you and best of luck.


  12. You could certainly see your expertise within the article you
    write. The arena hopes for even more passionate writers
    such as you who are not afraid to say how they believe.
    All the time follow your heart.


  13. Good site you have here.. It’s hard to find quality writing like yours nowadays.
    I honestly appreciate individuals like you! Take


  14. Its like you learn my mind! You appear to know so much
    about this, like you wrote the ebook in it or something.
    I think that you could do with a few % to force the message home a bit,
    but other than that, this is fantastic blog. A great read.
    I will certainly be back.


Leave a Reply to online blog Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s